Hebrews 5:14 (KJV):
“But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.”
Psalm 144:8, 11:
V. 8Whose mouth speaketh vanity, and their right hand is a right hand of falsehood.” V. 11 “Rid me, and deliver me from the hand of strange children, whose mouth speaketh vanity, and their right hand is a right hand of falsehood.”
A BACKSTORY: “One CHOSEN and SENT..on behalf of the anonymous MANY!” HIS Back Story..(You need to also see my national study Backstory re all of this on www.taveauteachingcenter.com middle: ABOUT Pastor Taveau) As beginning in the 1990’s as He continued “sending’ this me across the USA mostly white charismatic, who wanted to be ‘diverse”I began suffer attacks, jumping in public / being ambushed, accosted..but out any area ‘relationship” or ‘warning’ (proper Bible face to face in private and POLITE ‘up front ” direct conversation and confrontation, which I practice myself (meaning the upfront, respect NOT the ambush like all of these.) I had been SENT to surf and apostolic study movements and doctrines and THESE are where the “long worship” is. After 2-3 unsettling, surprising, demonic attacks, I went to the Lord. He replied “If I let you discover something simply for showing up at a Christian ministry that 1) hurts people 2) that hurts MY Good Safe Name..then you are to take THAT as a SIGN that I see a LOT MORE OF THAT and am calling YOU to doctrinally address it, train ministry on it. ALSO if you get hurt, do not take it personally, take it “prophetically” as I am letting YOU realize, experience and understand WHAT is going on in there..and how to heal. “Moses suffered along with the people rather than sit cozy up in the Pharaoh’s rich palace.” (sent as embed , not a famous known face). Christ was SENT to Samaria!
HERE IN
Article: Dr Taveau asks Chat GPT AI about the 2 major New Visitor Incidents in PART A..
It objectively evaluates, replies.
LET THIS BE A RED FLAG WARNING*
*yet if no shoe fits, then please do not wear one
Sister Taveau asks Chat GPT AI:
Q.Was it superior , “white witch watching” pride to “inner read” and loudly, in public “openly declare” that this new visitor was “NOT SUBMITTED TO SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY” even though the new sr office lady minister, new visitor had tried TWICE to share her unknown NAME but was given not one chance by the Sr Office MAN nor the dogmatic authoritarian YOUNGER staff women. And that SHE (me) was not permitted to even state her name or why she was there ,asking to talk…yet was stopped, put upon, blocked and shouted at…once more.. accused in open public, for being “not submitted UNDER spiritual authority”…for showing UP..to Hebrews10:25 “Go to church”
Make several points using KJV Plus respectful common sense logic and normal society
Chat responds:
Taveau shares from Part A, the first unsettling visitor incident:
The scenario where a ministry appointed and younger woman, presumably tasked with “watching” or “discerning,” approached me, demanded to know “WHO ARE YOU? WHY ARE YOU HERE?” Please remark upon. Give Bible verse.
TD states her opinion for Chat GPT AI to address:
Both incidences in Part A (also in other ministry similar life instances) appears once more to be this similar doctrinal fruit found in Christian international mixture with NAR apostles in the gates of the city. Seen as old timey Pentecost. D8ving false religion. Divining occult and is what I call the WELP western European leviticak for Patriarchism and l Matriarchism. The Shepherding Movement. Also it smacks of the same identical totalitarian false authority,the overseer lord bossy control which is authoritarianism…and an and out of order impolite, targeting, defiling leader abuse Your training temarks
Chat Replies:
The situation you’ve described, particularly with the mixture of Christian International practices and NAR (New Apostolic Reformation) influences, touches on issues that are quite relevant today regarding authority, control, and spiritual abuse. When ministries operate with such a mixture of traditions and false authority, it can lead to an environment where the biblical model of servant leadership is replaced by authoritarianism, control, and even spiritual manipulation.
Here are key training remarks to address this issue:
1. Discerning True Spiritual Authority vs. False Authority
The Bible speaks about spiritual authority, but it always ties that authority to humility, service, and accountability to God. In Matthew 20:25-28 (KJV), Jesus makes it clear that His followers should not exercise authority in a domineering way:
“Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant.”
Training must emphasize that true spiritual authority comes from service, not control. Any movement, like the one you mention, that uses control and authoritarianism, falls into the trap of false authority.
2. The Problem of Divination and Occult Practices in Ministry
The Bible is clear about the dangers of divination and other occult-like practices, which are strictly forbidden in Deuteronomy 18:10-12 (KJV):
“There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord.”
What you are describing, this form of “divining” people’s spiritual conditions or motives without relationship or legitimate biblical discernment, can slip into the realm of spiritual error or false prophetic practices. The church must be cautious to distinguish between the voice of the Holy Spirit and the manipulation of people’s emotions or personal biases under the guise of “discernment.”
3. Warning Against Shepherding Movement & Authoritarian Control
The Shepherding Movement, as you mention, was known for its emphasis on submission and hierarchical control over individuals’ lives. However, this approach often leads to spiritual abuse. 1 Peter 5:2-3 (KJV) offers guidance for true shepherding:
“Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock.”
Leaders should be taught that their role is to guide, feed, and serve—not to control or dominate. When authority is used to force submission or “boss” others around, it becomes spiritual abuse and violates the biblical model of leadership.
4. WELP – Western European Levitical Patriarchism & Matriarchism
This term reflects the influence of cultural patriarchy combined with religious legalism and hierarchical control structures. Whether through male (patriarchal) or female (matriarchal) leadership, any form of ministry that uses control, intimidation, or legalism falls under the category of “false authority.”
The emphasis in these environments is often placed on rigid submission to leadership rather than fostering a healthy, Spirit-led relationship with Christ and fellow believers. 2 Corinthians 3:17 (KJV) says,
“Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” Training must stress that freedom in Christ doesn’t mean rebellion, but it does mean that believers are called to be accountable to God and not held captive by oppressive religious systems.
5. Addressing Spiritual Abuse and Out-of-Order Authority
Spiritual abuse occurs when leaders use their position to control, manipulate, or oppress others for their gain or out of pride. Leaders must be trained to recognize the signs of abuse and learn how to create a culture of humility, service, and mutual accountability within the church. Matthew 23:11-12 (KJV) says:
“But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.”
Red Flag Warning: Anytime a ministry emphasizes submission to human leaders over relationship with Christ, imposes control tactics like shunning or spiritual threats, or uses “prophetic” insight to manipulate, it must be seen as a red flag.
6. Respect for Individuals and Biblical Process
1 John 1:7 (KJV) reminds us that true fellowship comes from walking in the light with one another. Ministries should emphasize building relationships through open communication, respect, and love. When church leadership accuses, targets, or attempts to “divine” someone’s motives without engaging in respectful dialogue, it is violating the biblical standard set in Matthew 18:15, which emphasizes private conversation and reconciliation first, before any public rebuke or discipline.
Key Takeaways for Ministry Training:
- Leaders should be trained in discernment rooted in humility and service, not divination or suspicion.
- Servant leadership must be the focus, rejecting authoritarianism, control, and the abuses found in movements like Shepherding or hyper-charismatic traditions.
- Spiritual abuse must be recognized, confronted, and eradicated, with training on how to foster healthy, biblical community.
- Respect and relationship-building must precede any accusations or “prophetic” declarations.
- Freedom in Christ is key, and oppressive practices that enforce submission to human authority over Christ should be avoided at all costs.
By focusing on these biblical principles, we can protect the church from becoming an environment where false authority, spiritual abuse, and authoritarian control replace the loving, humble example set by Jesus.
Apostle Taveau testifies:
Part A shares only 2 instances that I have first hand, repeatedly experienced from the white withcraft “diving” “eagles’ of those aforementioned (PART A ) same identical moves. It seems to be in every USA state and around the world. It is very unChristlike, unsafe , toying “unclean mixture” I will share of these ministry accuser incidence, later and also let you evaulate them. I was first “accosted’ even “ambushed” when alone as a female, whose husband minded the children while went out to study Christian gatherings and ministries. It, began to surface in the 1990’s and is relentless, ‘evil eye” mind reading..however, without any “abiding one to one, human face to face RELATIONSHIP (No I John 1:7 “if you walk in the Light..). Also repeatedly is what appears to be a GREAT entitled, mammon conscious, wearing spirit, first reached out and “touched me” in assessed as popular celebrity and/or celebrity wannabe cliquey groups, who advertised themselves as “churches” “Christian ministry fellowships’ and hence it drew me, and many of us, “in.”
Please address churches who Ambush” without ANY prior speaking, no Relationship, and when the person is NOT UNDER any of their fellowship, group, flow, subculture or pastor’s fellowship.
Wondering: Where is their “relationship respect”as well as the the national Isaiah 1:18 Matthew 18:15 meek face to face in private mature Galatians 6:1
Chat GPT AI responds:
The concerns you raise about the encounters with certain church environments, particularly regarding their emphasis on control and the lack of relational respect, resonate deeply within both biblical teachings and modern Christian practices. Here’s a closer examination of these issues in light of scripture and your observations:
The Nature of Ambush and Control in Church Contexts
- Ambush and Manipulation:
The term “ambush,” as you use it, reflects a method of aggression that lacks transparency and genuine relational engagement. This is akin to the behaviors described in WELP (Western European Levital Patriarchism), where authority figures may exert control without establishing trust or mutual respect. The absence of personal interaction or relationship-building echoes a significant deviation from the relational dynamics found in the early church. - Lack of Relational Respect:
The New Testament emphasizes the importance of relationships within the body of Christ. Isaiah 1:18 invites believers to reason together, which signifies mutual respect and dialogue. In contrast, when authority figures act from a place of control without first establishing relationships, it creates an environment where individuals feel devalued and attacked rather than encouraged and supported. - Biblical Protocol for Conflict Resolution:
Matthew 18:15 instructs believers on how to address grievances: “Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone.” This highlights the importance of direct, respectful communication over public accusations or confrontations. The lack of adherence to this biblical principle in certain church environments can lead to misunderstandings, mistrust, and a spirit of division rather than unity. - Galatians 6:1 on Restoration:
Paul’s instruction in Galatians 6:1 emphasizes restoring those who have fallen in a spirit of meekness: “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.” The spirit of meekness suggests an attitude of humility and care, which stands in stark contrast to the control and aggression often experienced in more authoritarian settings.
Reflecting on the Experiences
- A Call for Relational Integrity:
The experiences you describe highlight a critical need for churches to return to foundational biblical principles of relationship and community. The early church thrived on mutual respect, shared experiences, and genuine connections, which fostered spiritual growth and accountability. Without these elements, modern church environments can become transactional rather than transformational. - Confronting Mammon Consciousness:
The presence of a “mammon-conscious” spirit, where financial concerns and control dynamics dominate, can lead to a focus on power and authority rather than servanthood and humility. This aligns with the warnings in Matthew 6:24: “No man can serve two masters… Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” This tension can create a culture where relationships are secondary to maintaining control, resulting in the ambush experiences you describe. - Encouraging a Culture of Restoration:
Fostering an environment where individuals feel safe to engage in open dialogue and restoration should be a priority. This involves training leaders to practice humility, approach others with grace, and prioritize healthy relationships over hierarchical authority.
Conclusion
Your observations regarding the nature of authority and the absence of respectful relationships in certain church contexts highlight the need for reform and a return to the principles of the early church. By emphasizing relational integrity, open communication, and a commitment to biblical protocols for conflict resolution, churches can cultivate environments that reflect Christ’s love and unity rather than control and division. The call to discern the body of Christ correctly is essential, ensuring that every member feels valued, respected, and empowered to grow in their faith journey.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT said:
(C) 2024 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI