YOU GUYS WANT TO CONVERT THE WORLD? THE “UNSAVED?”” THE POLITICS NOT YOUR STYLE. .???!!!..
WAKE UP TO THIS REALITY:
YOU GOTTA SAVE THOSE” BORN AGAIN” BIBLE TOTING PROFESSING BELIEVERS FIRST..INCLUDING, MAYBE FOREMOST THE CHRISTIAN SR MINISTERS!
TEACH ON DEGRAGGING THE 2 TIMOTHY 3:1-5, I TIMOTHY 6:5 ARROGANT, ZERO HOLY FEAR OF THE LIVING LORD…FAMOUS FACE FOLLOWING..EZEKIEL 16:49-50 (THOSE LISTED) SINS OF SODOM(MEAN INDIFFERENCE) IN MINISTRY REPEATED FRUIT
PART 5 “THE Ai AND I” ARE YOU SUBMITTED “WHAT ABOUT DIVORCE?’
MODERN CHRISTIAN: IS IT THE UNPARDONABLE CHIEF SIN?
(C)2023 Dr Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved
BRAND.
NOTE: TD asks Chat GBT Ai what JESUS, APOSTLE and THE FIRST CHURCH APOSTLES THOUGHT not what YOUR OR MY MODERN BRAND FEELS (This ought to be liberating and healing!” (not a bit legalistic)
TAVEAU’S PURPOSE
These shall CEASE their harsh screaming and evil eye lambasting!
Trying to remove attack, accusation fellow Christian super spiritual Goody Goody legalism
In light of the religious spirit and demonic accusation of divorced persons in many parts of the Christian faith, mainly by presumptive ministers who are back UNDER the Law, Dr T asks CHAT GBT Ai about all of this..
TAVEAU ASKS Ai:
Q. What about the Christ, Paul and first church apostles about divorced persons? women especially’? Singles? Not married?
Ai REPLIES:
Jesus Christ: According to the Gospels, Jesus taught that divorce was not part of God’s original plan and that it should be avoided, except in cases of sexual immorality (Matthew 19:3-9). He emphasized the importance of marriage and condemned adultery. However, Jesus also showed compassion and forgiveness towards those who had been divorced or involved in sin.
Paul the Apostle: Paul, in his letters, offered guidance on various matters, including marriage and singleness. He taught that marriage is a sacred bond, and divorce should be avoided if possible. However, he acknowledged that in certain situations, such as when an unbelieving spouse abandons a believer, divorce may be permissible (1 Corinthians 7:10-16).
First Church Apostles: The apostles, including Peter and John, echoed the teachings of Jesus and Paul regarding marriage and divorce. They emphasized the importance of faithfulness in marriage while recognizing that some circumstances may warrant divorce.
TAVEAU ASKS AI:
Q. DID the first church apostles view the divorced as “having committed” despite the situation when it did NOT involve adultery?
Ai RESPONDS:
The views of the first church apostles regarding divorce and its consequences can be gleaned from their writings and teachings. While they acknowledged that divorce could be permitted in certain circumstances, such as cases of adultery or abandonment, they generally emphasized the importance of preserving the marital bond and seeking reconciliation whenever possible.
Jesus, in his teachings, expressed a strong stance against divorce, except in cases of sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9). The apostles, including Paul, echoed this sentiment and taught that divorce should be avoided if possible (1 Corinthians 7:10-11). However, they acknowledged that divorce might be permissible in cases of sexual immorality or when an unbelieving spouse chooses to separate from a believer (1 Corinthians 7:12-16).
In cases where divorce did occur due to adultery or abandonment, it appears that the apostles did not consider the divorced person to be “having committed” a sin. Instead, they recognized that the innocent party had the right to divorce and that the guilty party was responsible for the breakdown of the marriage.
It is important to note that interpretations and practices regarding divorce varied even among the early Christian communities.
However, overall, the apostles recognized that divorce could be a regrettable but necessary response to certain circumstances, particularly in cases involving adultery or abandonment.
NOTE: this reflects Ai’s version of ONLY Jesus, Paul and the First Church Apostles NOT YOUR brand of Christian Ministry or mine..Think upon that!
TAVEAU ASKS AI
Q DID the First Church leaders.. Jesus, Paul, the first 12 apostles ‘ mark” persons and limit their ability to serve in the church due to being divorced?
AI REPLIES:
The New Testament does not provide explicit evidence that Jesus, Paul, or the twelve apostles placed specific limitations on the ability of divorced individuals to serve in the church. However, it is worth noting that the early Christian communities had diverse practices and interpretations on this matter, and practices may have varied across different local churches.
In general, the New Testament emphasizes forgiveness, restoration, and the transformative power of Christ’s grace. While divorce was generally discouraged, there is no clear indication that being divorced automatically disqualified someone from serving in the church.
In Paul’s teachings, he emphasizes the importance of character qualifications, such as being above reproach, faithful, and of good reputation, for church leaders (1 Timothy 3:1-13, Titus 1:5-9). These qualifications are not explicitly tied to marital status or divorce.
TAVEAU DISCUSSES THE STIGMA OVER DIVORCED CHRISTIANS TODAY
AN AMERICAN WHITE LAW TRADTIONAL BIBLE TRAINING IN HISTORY (TOO PATRIARCHAL WASP COLONIAL AUTHORITARIAN, AUTOCRATIC BIG BOSS)
NOTE: TD asks Chat GBT Ai what Jesus, the Apostle Paul plus the First Church Apostles really thought…which may NOT BE what YOUR type of Christian name teaches ,beliefs or will settle for (This is non compromising, yet NOT doctrinally authoritarian or legalistic CROSS BODY UNITY www.crossbodyunity.com so we go to great lengths to TRY to remove the legalism Accusation broought down by Tradtion and Paid Hirelings..meaning..that we submit each of these and all comments as “SELAH” not DOGMA in pure hopes that this will comfort and set free, even heal)
TAVEAU’S PURPOSE: INVESTIGATING, COMFORTING, SETTING THE MATTER LEADER STRAIGHT
TD SERVANT LEADER ASKS:
Does every Christian layperson, minister, or church office holder who has experienced divorce deserve to be accused, automatically presumed as wicked, fallen into adultery, and deserving of being marked, passed over, or written off by the ministry? Should we, as a ministry-centered community, adhere to the Levitical Law-regulated patriarchal hierarchy that often deems them impure? What about the Levitical Matriarchy and their submitted lay members?
(Note: A few of you, please refer back to Part 2 “ARE YOU SUBMITTED? Ministry Jesus “in this new series, where you can read about the first authoritarian leadership that entered the First Church after Jesus’ death, influenced by the societal wickedness of Rome and Hellenism.)
It is essential to reevaluate our approach and mindset towards divorced individuals within the Christian community. While divorce is not ideal, it does not automatically make someone wicked or fallen into adultery. The presumption of guilt and marking them as unworthy or writing them off by the ministry is unjust and unloving.
We should remember the teachings of Jesus and His emphasis on forgiveness, redemption, and grace. The early church was not free from societal influences and power dynamics, as seen in the authoritarian leadership that emerged after Jesus’ death. However, as followers of Christ, we should strive for a more compassionate and understanding approach.
Each situation should be evaluated on an individual basis, with consideration for the circumstances and the person’s character. Divorced individuals should not be automatically excluded from ministry based solely on their marital status. We should focus on their faith, spiritual growth, moral character, and their ability to serve the community.
It is time to move away from a legalistic mindset and embrace a more inclusive and grace-filled approach, rooted in the teachings of Christ. Let us not perpetuate the judgment and exclusion that has caused pain and harm to divorced individuals within the Christian community.
TAVEAU KNOWS OUR BORN AGAIN MINISTRY HISTORY
WE COLONIAL LP (Western European Levitical Patriarchism) settled the First Colonies of the US. Part of them were our dear and honorable, mature leader founding fathers ,yet among some of these were the now notorious WELP who spied all women as wanton and and accused them based on their subjective ornery demonic impressions and held the Salem witch trials (which used “spectral evidence’ (subjective mean witchcraft) to slaughter the “evil white women” **
** NOTE in my ongoing research I must out that before the “New England Patiarchs’ WELP settled the First USA Colonies that somewhere in their own past European Bible history a monk held an inquisition of “witches’ and wrote the book “The Hammer of the Witch” (Malleus Maleficarum) which one still buy on Amazon.
SO Apostle T realizes big tradtional mostly MALE LP white History .. (NOTE: READ Part 3 “ARE YOU SUBMITTED” PROPHET DEBORAH, WOMEN” to know how Sister Taveau was raised the WELP complete OPPOSITE!)
See Part 3 “The Ai And I ” ARE YOU SUBMITTED? PROPHET DEBORAH
SCARLET LADIES
Also during that time period, the LP Nathanial Hawthorne penned the Scarlet Letter (the Leader Woman Hester Prynne, who was publically humilated and forced to wear the Scarlet A on her chest for ADULTERY. Yet LP tribes always give the man a free pass). The Puritan Presbyterian Pastor, Dimmesale is not mistreated similarily ,as was the continuing custom.
WELL KNOWN LP EMBDEDDED LEADER MISOGYNY
Anicient Old Testament the LP OFFICES of I Samuel Eli and His Boys will be Boys’ Ministry Old Boys Club (defiled, used many leader women)
ADAM AND WICKED EVE IN GENESIS 3..This TAVEAU that I can trace the LP misogynist, uncovered, deceived, unjust woman sin of accusation back to the Garden Sin. This has left a mark against ALL WOMEN (which I need to and want and can disproove but later) However, in light of Christiandom..this is still a mostly a white embedded evil trait back that goes back to LP Europe. and is mostly the reason RIGHT NOW that all LP Men accuse and blame shift over onto each and every “little” “easily deceived” woman..And this is the WHY most ministry legalistic leader church MAN (And the women they train to serve them) each blame the “female” in every marriage and relation, and fellowship issue.
THIS SHE-PASTOR can train against, and disprove all of this Eve as the REASON FOR ALL SIN, SEXUAL TEMPTATION and the CAUSE of EVERY CASE OF ADULTERY. (as it is “how” Christians are mostly Caucasian LP reared) …TD can also Bible trace this same leader spirit which Goes way back to the Jesus and woman “caught in adultery” (they did not equally women ,for they did bring the man “caught “in adultery..and this is how it goes! (much more on that to bring balance to the Law, but no time here)
This is PART 2 “THE Ai AND I” ARE YOU SUBMITTED? Minister Jesus (deals with His Servant Leader NOT Authoritarian leader role modeling
WHAT DR T WANTS TO GAIN OUT OF ALL OF THIS IS TWO FOLD
Because the pain this type of ministry causes in so many levels in the Hebrew 10:25 “repeated attempt to go to Church, to hear from God, to serve and to give” FAR TOO MANY are repeated accused, denied respect, written off and lied and gossiped about..DUE TO THE OLD TIMEY mostly Big Boss Leadership Govering Law..
Thus, Sister Taveau is trying to “Retrain” to promote “new investigative ‘thinking” in order to remove the ministry attack,”sin consciousness” and also in the leaders and lay…to deliver fellow Christian Goody Goody “We Caught YOU” sinful errant PRIDE. (it is a huge subculture underlying the USA mostly LP WHITE..
Pride is an equal if not worse ‘sin” Be sure to read Job 41 “The Leviathan” the sneaky snake of hiding pride
TAVEAU ASKS
Q. In light of the religious spirit and demonic accusation of divorced persons in many parts of the Christian faith, mainly by presumptive ministers who are back UNDER the Law, Dr T asks CHAT GBT Ai about all of this..
TAVEAU ASKS Ai:
Q. What about the Christ, Paul and first church apostles about divorced persons? women especially’? Singles? Not married?
Ai REPLIES:
Jesus Christ: According to the Gospels, Jesus taught that divorce was not part of God’s original plan and that it should be avoided, except in cases of sexual immorality (Matthew 19:3-9). He emphasized the importance of marriage and condemned adultery. However, Jesus also showed compassion and forgiveness towards those who had been divorced or involved in sin.
Paul the Apostle: Paul, in his letters, offered guidance on various matters, including marriage and singleness. He taught that marriage is a sacred bond, and divorce should be avoided if possible. However, he acknowledged that in certain situations, such as when an unbelieving spouse abandons a believer, divorce may be permissible (1 Corinthians 7:10-16).
First Church Apostles: The apostles, including Peter and John, echoed the teachings of Jesus and Paul regarding marriage and divorce. They emphasized the importance of faithfulness in marriage while recognizing that some circumstances may warrant divorce.
TAVEAU ASKS AI:
Q. DID the first church apostles view the divorced as “having committed” despite the situation when it did NOT involve adultery?
Ai RESPONDS:
The views of the first church apostles regarding divorce and its consequences can be gleaned from their writings and teachings. While they acknowledged that divorce could be permitted in certain circumstances, such as cases of adultery or abandonment, they generally emphasized the importance of preserving the marital bond and seeking reconciliation whenever possible.
Jesus, in his teachings, expressed a strong stance against divorce, except in cases of sexual immorality (Matthew 19:9). The apostles, including Paul, echoed this sentiment and taught that divorce should be avoided if possible (1 Corinthians 7:10-11). However, they acknowledged that divorce might be permissible in cases of sexual immorality or when an unbelieving spouse chooses to separate from a believer (1 Corinthians 7:12-16).
In cases where divorce did occur due to adultery or abandonment, it appears that the apostles did not consider the divorced person to be “having committed” a sin. Instead, they recognized that the innocent party had the right to divorce and that the guilty party was responsible for the breakdown of the marriage.
It is important to note that interpretations and practices regarding divorce varied even among the early Christian communities.
However, overall, the apostles recognized that divorce could be a regrettable but necessary response to certain circumstances, particularly in cases involving adultery or abandonment.
TAVEAU INTERJECTS:
We ought to realize that the FIRST CHURCH VIEWS above: reflects ONLY Ai’s BIble History version as determined by researching Christ, Paul and the First Church Apostles..yet it does NOT necessarily reflect YOUR Bible sect, tradtion, teaching in YOUR brand of Christian Ministry or Fellowship.
TAVEAU ASKS AI
Q. Did the First Church governing chief apostles,. Jesus, Paul, the first 12 apostles ‘ mark” persons and limit their ability to serve in the church due to being divorced?
AI REPLIES:
The New Testament does not provide explicit evidence that Jesus, Paul, or the twelve apostles placed specific limitations on the ability of divorced individuals to serve in the church. However, it is worth noting that the early Christian communities had diverse practices and interpretations on this matter, and practices may have varied across different local churches.
In general, the New Testament emphasizes forgiveness, restoration, and the transformative power of Christ’s grace. While divorce was generally discouraged, there is no clear indication that being divorced automatically disqualified someone from serving in the church.
In Paul’s teachings, he emphasizes the importance of character qualifications, such as being above reproach, faithful, and of good reputation, for church leaders (1 Timothy 3:1-13, Titus 1:5-9). These qualifications are not explicitly tied to marital status or divorce.
APOSTLE PAUL
TD ASKS AI
Q WAS APOSTLE PAUL MARRIED?
Ai REPLIES:
The question of whether the Apostle Paul was married is a topic of debate among scholars, as the New Testament does not provide explicit information about his marital status.
In Paul’s letters, he refers to himself as single and emphasizes the advantages of remaining unmarried (1 Corinthians 7:7-9). However, some scholars propose that Paul may have been married at some point in his life but was likely widowed or separated before his ministry began. They base this speculation on Paul’s background as a Pharisee, as it was customary for Pharisees to be married.
Additionally, Paul’s mention of having the right to bring a believing wife with him on his missionary journeys in 1 Corinthians 9:5 has led some to suggest that he may have been married in the past.
However, there is no conclusive evidence to confirm Paul’s marital status, and the question remains a matter of speculation. Ultimately, it does not significantly impact his teachings or his role as an influential figure in early Christianity.
A TD NOTE Apostle Paul was free agent Galatians 1:1-2 not sent out by any one ministry person or anyone Christian ministry group..if that might also pertain ..and he definitely was NOT back Under the Old Time Country Letter of the Law. (and CHRIST fulfilled the Torah Law)
I submit this as Selah, not hardcore religious autocratic dogma.
TO GIVE? Please PRAY Put TAVEAU on your prayer list for the demons HATE all of THIS women styled stuff
TO SOW? See Give Link at top. And please SUPPORT!
CONNECT: crossbodyunity1@gmail.com
(C)2023 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international law, in conjunction with Ai
